Rave reviews of John Harbison's "Abu Ghraib" at Rockport are here and here. The work for piano and cello includes the melody of an Iraqi lullaby. Harbison (left, via Wikipedia
) says it is not a protest, but the two dailies say it's "cathartic" and "haunting" and lodges in the mind. I can't shake the feeling that this work would have gotten more attention during the Vietnam era. Like an NYTimes review for starters that would have spread word about it nationally. Perhaps the web will serve that function. Admittedly the Rockport Chamber Music Festival isn't Carnegie Hall and this wasn't Leonard Bernstein or some other famous '60s dissenter. But still it does raise questions about the role of high art in debates like the one over the war in Iraq - and the role of arts journalists in spreading word of such works. A Globe columnist today tackles the Dixie Chicks controversy. But in today's culture, how and where does more formal work engage society? Perhaps the question also sheds some light on the larger debate about the role and fate of classical music.





